This one stands closest to the AP - 50 cm, antena to antena. Last machine tested was win11 PC with Intel ax 210 nic. My testing laptop and phone (MacBook Pro 2019, 802.11ac 3/MIMO, iPhone 11 which is 802.11ax 2/MIMO) are about 2.5 meters away from the AP in a straight line. Interesting thing that this 300 Mbit seem to be some cap as it mostly equal 300 sharp. it is also very unstable, drops to very low MCS and low speeds (80-108 Mbps) testing stations never reaches more than 300 Mbit/s real speed to NAS or Internet (AP-> 1G LAN ->virtual pfSense router on i5-12600 server, so fast as it can be-> 1G internet) and it never ever negotiates more link speed than 400 Mbit. I'm so much disappointed with AX3 performance. I have tested the setup by drop in replacement of the existing cheap AP - place, obstacles, distance and devices operating are exactly the same. The same applies to broadcast/multicast traffic if multicast helper is not enabled. So improvement is only seen during actual data transfers allowing for higher datarates at the same (marginal) signal strength. However, beacons are transmitted without using those tricks because they are intended also towards "about to register" clients (which are thus not yet known to AP) and towards dormant clients (which might have moved relatively to AP's location but without gaving active two-way connection AP can not determine direction towards such client). using 4x4 (and higher order) MIMO offers some features which give better service outside best area of AP coverage (beam forming, space diversity). The power backoff explains why maximum throughput can be same on two APs with different signal strengths, specially if Tx power is set for maximum coverage area. In case of PtP links, using higher fain antennae on both ends help improve both directions. However higher gain antenna helps in uplink, upload will be better because AP "hears better". If country regulations limit Tx power lower than PA capability, then real power backoff happens at higher VHT or even doesn't happen). When using higher gain antenna on AP downlink doesn't change much (if at all): coverage is the same, service is the same (or slightly better power amplifiers in low cost WiFi APs have "power backoff" meaning that when transmitting higher MCS/VHT, the power capability is lower. Higher gain antenna, by being directional (more or less), can also help to reduce noise part of SINR, but amount of reduction highly depends on overall situation around receiver. Sum of first two is more or less EIRP and thus limited by country regulation, path loss is property of physical space between transmitter and receiver and receiver antenna gain is something that can be improved on certain devices. Signal in receiver is sum of transmitter power (power amplifier), transmitter antenna gain, path loss and receiver antenna gain. Remember that obtainable throughput is related to SINR of receiver. higher gain antenna does help to improve reception. So for best coverage use 1-chain AP with 20MHz channel width. With wider channels power is dispersed more and signal strength will again be lower. It will also mean that it will sum power per whole channel width. 4x4 MIMO or higher) will present as lower signal strength. Per device means that it'll sum over all transmit antennae and using many antennae (e.g. Effective means it takes into account antenna gain so high antenna gain on transmitter will not present as higher signal strength. Use the Orientation property of the ColorPicker control to specify whether the editing controls should align vertically or horizontally, relative to the color spectrum.What country regulations limit is effective radiated power per device. It can also be specified as a standalone element in the XAML tree, letting you place InfoBadge into any control or piece of UI that you choose.ĪPI reference Horizontal Orientation in ColorPicker InfoBadge is built into the NavigationView control. An InfoBadge is a small piece of UI that can be added into an app and customized to display a number, icon, or a simple dot. New or updated features for WinUI 2.7 include: InfoBadgeīadging is a non-intrusive and intuitive way to indicate notifications, display alerts, highlight new content, or draw focus to an area within an app. For more information, see Getting started with the Windows UI 2 Library. WinUI packages can be added to Visual Studio projects through the NuGet package manager. WinUI is hosted in the Windows UI Library repo on GitHub where we welcome bug reports, feature requests, and community code contributions.Īll stable releases (and prereleases) are available for download from our GitHub release page or from our NuGet page. For more information on building Windows desktop and UWP apps with the latest version of WinUI 3, see Windows UI Library 3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |